Today's most viewed
New scaled-down blueprint
THE latest attempt to squeeze more housing into the Salisbury district without upsetting too many people got under way this week.
There will be no new town at Firsdown, or anywhere else on greenfield land, and just four key sites have been identified for major housing development.
Faced with massive protests over their wide-ranging proposals earlier this year to provide 12,400 homes over two decades, council planners have chosen to focus the consultation process on immediate essentials.
This means a five-year plan to build 3,500 new homes alongside existing large developments at Fugglestone Red, Old Sarum and Hampton Park in Salisbury, and Archer's Gate at Amesbury.
These, they say, will meet the district's most pressing needs.
It will be left to the new Wiltshire unitary authority, which takes over next year, to decide where to put the other 8,900 homes which must be accommodated, after consulting local communities.
Current thinking is that, in total, the Salisbury and Wilton area will take 8,700 new homes; the Amesbury area 2,240; and the southern area 590 - including 50 at Alderbury, a similar number at
Laverstock, and 200 in and around Downton.
The western area will take 510 - up to 300 of them at Mere - and the Nadder area 360, with a maximum of 250 at Tisbury.
One main problem highlighted by the planners is the need for affordable homes.
Their surveys suggest that even if all the new housing qualified as affordable, it would not meet the demand.
As it is, builders will be told to make 40 per cent of any new development affordable, and even that is considered a tough target to enforce. "It's not possible to pull up the drawbridge and say we're fine as we are," said forward planning team leader David Milton, who stressed Salisbury and Wiltshire were working
closely together on the issue.
"Businesses are telling us we are on the verge of a crisis in terms of workforce."
Planning portfolio holder, Paul Clegg, said: "This isn't really about nationally-imposed targets. It's about what local people tell us they need now."
The draft consultation document, Our Place In The Future, was approved by the council's cabinet when it met on Tuesday.
Have your say
A DOCUMENT detailing the proposals will be sent out to every household in the district next month.
Then an official eight-week consultation period starts on September 1.
There will be a series of exhibitions where planning officers will be available.These will be at: Salisbury Guildhall, September 1; Grove
Buildings, Mere, September 2; Victoria Hall, Tisbury, September 3; Antrobus House, Amesbury, September 4; St Laurence's Church Hall, Downton,
September 5, and Michael Herbert Hall, Wilton, September 6, all open from noon to 7pm.
In addition, people can visit www.salisbury.gov.uk/preferredoptions
for information on the entire forward planning exercise, not just those aspects highlighted in the latest consultation document.It is still not too late to comment on other elements.
10:58am Thursday 17th July 2008
Print 
Email this
CommentPosted by: john coleman, Salisbury on 5:48pm Thu 17 Jul 08
Whilst Salisbury District Council and the Amesbury Town Market Plan calls for more affordable housing, and there is always a shortfall of such acccommodation it is of some concern that Amesbury Town Council, which includes 4 members of the Northern Area Planning Committee, has strongly objected to a proposal to redevelop the former Texaco site in the centre of Amesbury into 22 flats for the Raglan Housing Association. The Amesbury Town Council has refused to discuss this proposal with the applicants or Raglan Housing Association. The Planning Officers have recommended the application for approval, but it has been called in to Committee for determination, and it would appear that the Committee is likely to refuse permission. What price the fine words of Councillors in respect of providing affordable housing in the District?
Whilst Salisbury District Council and the Amesbury Town Market Plan calls for more affordable housing, and there is always a shortfall of such acccommodation it is of some concern that Amesbury Town Council, which includes 4 members of the Northern Area Planning Committee, has strongly objected to a proposal to redevelop the former Texaco site in the centre of Amesbury into 22 flats for the Raglan Housing Association. The Amesbury Town Council has refused to discuss this proposal with the applicants or Raglan Housing Association. The Planning Officers have recommended the application for approval, but it has been called in to Committee for determination, and it would appear that the Committee is likely to refuse permission. What price the fine words of Councillors in respect of providing affordable housing in the District?
What are these links for?
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
More on Digg
More on del.icio.us
More on Furl
More on reddit
More on NowPublic/
More on Yahoo!